THere are only two choices:
the private sector,
the public sector.
you are 100% for the public sector.
no wrong guy about it.
so you were against the bail out-big deal,
you are for larger, more instrusive government.
you post as much in every other post.
you want the government evening out this imaginary playing field as much as theoretically possible.
all the while they do nothing but take a huge cut and do jack.
question-current economic problems.
answer more government control, regulation, legislation.
(as if this matters a bit, the idea that introducing more gov't at higher expense stops the crooks any more than it stops the real actors is ridiculous, same people end up with the money in the end, same dupes from junk bond era were buying this sub prime debt-so why constantly waste resources on inept gov't beaurocrats like the SEC and FASB?)
being against the bailout because you incorrectly still view it as taxpayers paying for luxury boxes vs every bank being contaminated with sub prime slime hardly paints any kind of picture at all.
__________________
"An inexhaustible good nature is one of the most precious gifts of heaven, spreading itself like oil over the troubled sea of thought, and keeping the mind smooth and equable in the roughest weather." Washington Irving
Last edited by Breakage : 10-03-2008 at 01:33 PM.
|